Glow Plug System Failure: Causes, Symptoms & Diesel Engine Starting Problems

Glow Plug System Failure – Diesel Engine Starting Issues (Complete Guide) Introduction Diesel engines are widely used in heavy equipment, generators, trucks, cranes, and industrial machinery because of their power, fuel efficiency, and durability. However, one of the most common complaints from operators and technicians is hard starting or no-start conditions , especially during cold weather or early morning starts. . Unlike petrol engines that use spark plugs, diesel engines rely on high compression heat to ignite fuel. During cold conditions, the engine block and air temperature are too low to support proper combustion. This is where the glow plug system plays a critical role. When the glow plug system fails, the engine may crank normally but fail to start, produce white smoke, or run very rough . This article explains in detail how the glow plug system works, why it fails, how to diagnose problems, and how to prevent diesel engine starting issues caused by glow plug system ...

Twisted Pair Wiring in Komatsu CAN Bus

 

CAN Bus Communication Faults in Komatsu Excavators: NE02 / CA558 Diagnostic Protocol

CAN communication faults in Komatsu excavators can cause serious operational issues, including loss of data exchange between ECUs and unexpected machine behavior. The most common diagnostic trouble codes (DTCs) associated with CAN failures are NE02 (ECM–Monitor communication failure) and CA558 (general CAN malfunction). This guide explains the CAN architecture, common failure causes, and a practical diagnostic workflow.

Understanding the CAN Bus in Komatsu Excavators

Komatsu PC200‑8 uses an ISO 11898‑2 compliant CAN 2.0B network operating at 250 kbps. It uses differential signaling through CAN_H and CAN_L, 29‑bit extended identifiers, and 120Ω termination resistors at both ends of the bus.

Komatsu PC200-8 CAN Bus wiring diagram showing ECM, MC, PVC, GC, and 120Ω termination resistors


Primary ECUs on the CAN Network

ECU Function
ECMEngine Control Module
MCMonitor Controller
PVCPump Valve Controller
GCGate Controller
GPS/IQANTelematics System

Why CAN Communication Fails

1. Hardware / Wiring Issues

  • Voltage deviation on CAN_H or CAN_L
  • Differential voltage collapse below 0.9V
  • Damaged twisted pair wiring
  • Incorrect termination (not 120Ω)
  • Electromagnetic interference (EMI)

2. Software / Protocol Issues

  • ECU entering error‑passive or bus‑off state
  • CRC errors
  • Message acknowledgment failures
  • Bit timing mismatches

Diagnostic Workflow for NE02 / CA558

Phase 1: Preliminary Checks

  • Review freeze‑frame data
  • Check ECU wake‑up signals
  • Verify network management messages

Phase 2: Physical Layer Testing

Expected CAN Voltage Levels:

  • CAN_H: 2.5V ± 0.5V
  • CAN_L: 2.5V ± 0.5V
  • Differential voltage: ~2V

Termination Check:

  • Measure resistance between CAN_H and CAN_L → 60Ω ±10%

Phase 3: Protocol Analysis

  • Check arbitration priority
  • Identify error frames
  • Verify inter‑frame spacing

Advanced Diagnostic Techniques

Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR)

Used to locate impedance mismatches or cable breaks. Formula: D = (Δt × v) / 2

Bus Loading Analysis

  • Acceptable load: <30% at 250 kbps
  • Check message latency and peak utilization

ECU Isolation Method

  • Disconnect ECUs one by one
  • Monitor bus voltage recovery
  • Measure leakage current (<10 µA)

Repair Procedures

Wiring Harness Repair

  • Maintain twist rate: 33 twists/meter
  • Match CAN_H and CAN_L length
  • Ensure shield continuity

Termination Network Validation

  • Each end must have 120Ω ±5% resistor
  • Capacitance to ground <50 pF

Case Study: Intermittent NE02 on PC200‑8

Komatsu PC200-8 CAN Bus wiring diagram showing ECM, MC, PVC, GC, and 120Ω termination resistors


A PC200‑8 experienced sporadic CAN loss during hydraulic operation. Diagnostics revealed voltage sag and EMI from the pump controller. Adding a 470µF capacitor, installing a common‑mode choke, and improving grounding eliminated the fault for over 500 hours.

Conclusion

CAN communication faults require a structured diagnostic approach starting from the physical layer and progressing to protocol analysis. Proper wiring practices, grounding improvements, and predictive maintenance significantly reduce NE02 and CA558 occurrences.

Comments